A Twitter person has opined that it’s higher to financially empower 100 males than to empower 1000 ladies as a result of a person’s cash doesn’t stick with him alone however transfers it to his spouse and her in-laws.
@Bambulu in his tweet opined that males are hypogamists (marry down), whereas ladies do the precise reverse.
He additionally claimed that within the listing of rich ladies on the planet. most of them acquired their wealth from divorce or inheritance from their late companions.
See his tweets under……
“Dating wise, it’s better to empower 100 men financially than to empower 1000 women. This is because men are hypogamists, ie, they all marry down. While women do the exact opposite. Let’s explain further.
“On this case, 99% of these males will most probably decide ladies who’re decrease than them on the monetary scale. A few of these ladies might be broke & jobless & even from poverty-stricken houses.
“Thus we see that the man’s money doesn’t stay with him alone. He transfers his wealth to his woman & his in-laws.
“On the otherhand, 100% of these ladies will aspire to accept males who’re richer than them. Whereas some are fortunate to get richer males, some get males who’re equally as wealthy as them & the remaining who could not get their first selection typically keep single, wealthy & single.
“So we can say that the chances of those 1000 women settling for a broke, jobless man & empowering him & his family is next to zero.
“That is why I all the time say that there is not any honour in a girl’s love. Her love is all the time egocentric & self-seeking.
“To buttress further, when you check the list of richest women in the world. Women who came from nothing made the list because they were beneficiaries of either divorce or inheritance from their late partners.
“Whereas that is by no means the case with the boys’s listing. Says so much concerning the gender that’s extra caring, selfless & sacrificial. Girls empowerment would not distribute wealth.”