Atiku Wouldn’t Have Been Nigerian If Not For Referendum — Kanu’s Lawyer Explains
It has been revealed that Atiku Abukakar would have come from a special nation if not for referendum.
The Particular Counsel to the Chief of the Indigenous Folks of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, Aloy Ejimakor made the revelation on Twitter.
In response to Ejimakor, agitation for self-determination is respectable.
Ejimakor stated the directive of the United Nations calling for the discharge of Kanu exhibits their agitation is recognised.
Ejimafor additional said that the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Get together, Atiku Abubakar, wouldn’t have been a Nigerian citizen if not for a referendum.
He famous that the Nigerian authorities gained Adamawa State and misplaced Southern Cameroon via referendum and no one was detained, killed or terribly renditioned.
Ejimakor pointed to different nations that had been created via a referendum.
Kanu’s lawyer puzzled why the Nigerian authorities is reluctant to conduct a referendum for Biafra.
Ejimafor urged that Federal Authorities cease suppressing the agitation for Biafra through the use of the army pressure on the agitators, however organise a referendum and permit the folks to determine whether or not or not they want to be autonomous.
The lawyer, in a put up on his Twitter account, wrote, “The UN directives on #MNK affirmed that separatist agitation is authorized & that referendum is a respectable software for settling it.
“Nigeria gained Adamawa and misplaced Southern Cameroon via referendum and no one was detained, killed or terribly renditioned.
“It’s a referendum that made Atiku a Nigerian. And it was via the Referendum that Midwest Area got here into being in 1964.
“That is all inside Nigeria, not counting nations created by referendum – Eritrea, Kosovo, South Sudan, and so on.
“The problem is not the separatist agitation. The problem is the militarist response to it. That’s is exactly what is convulsing South-East and Nigeria by extension.”
You must log in to post a comment.